Sleeping by the Mississippi

2018-02-25 15.09.18

A romantic photographic documentary of the Mississippi River, this book screams ‘deep’ America. Full of individual characters, varying landscapes and a road less travelled. It shows me the complete opposite of ‘stereo-typical’ America and shows me ‘real’ America.

There are two essays in the book and selected notes to the photographs which add more background information to selected images. Alas there are no background notes provided for ‘Patrick’.

The images in the book flow in a photo essay style similar the that of Robert Frank’s ‘The Americans’.

2018-02-25 15.52.352018-02-25 15.52.422018-02-25 15.52.49

These images are not of one and the same place, yet they flow and tell a story.

The first image is captioned ‘ Peters houseboat, Winona, Minnesota’ the second is Charles, Vasa, Minnesota yet they seem alike, The third image is Charles Lindbergh’s boyhood bed, Little Falls, Minnesota.

The connection is not only in the place , Minnesota, but in their dreams. According to the notes Peter dreams of running water and has lived on a houseboat for over twenty years. Charles holds his model planes and looks very much like an old-fashioned aviator and in the last image we see the boyhood bed of Charles Lindbergh who completed the first solo transatlantic flight in his plane, Spirit of St. Louis. Did he dream of this as a boy? Sleeping outside looking up at the sky?

Selfie – How the West became self-obsessed

I purchased this book by Will Storr as it looked like it might add to my research on Selfies.

2018-06-02 17.23.42

What a fascinating read, I started dog-earing pages of interest until I realised that I was dog-earing the majority of the book! In short the book chronicles the human self from ancient history to the present day and its connections in time with psychology, economics and culture.

Interestingly it seems that according to this book our Westernised Self can be traced back to the early Greeks and Romans. The closest thing that the Greeks had to heaven was Elysium, invitations to Elysium were based on status and not self worth. They saw themselves as individuals rather than part of a connected whole much as we do today. We are tribal and we have a sense of working towards our own personal goals, there is hierarchy and as Aristotle believed it is natural to be competitive and it is natural to move towards perfection.

In the East however they are moulded from the era of Confucius, the belief being that the superior man has nothing to compete for, he is not boastful but conceals his virtue. The superior man allows for equilibrium and group harmony to exist in perfection. Confucius expected people to do the right thing simply because it was the right thing to do, not for award or praise.

Interestingly the book points out how much of these ancient beginnings are still evident today, and how differently the East and West think about the world around them. The book mentions showing Westerners and Easterners pictures for 3 seconds, the Westerners would look at the main object and only occasionally drift out to the context. The Chinese looked constantly back and forth between object and context. In another study they looked as news reports of mass murderers, the Western press would blame flaws in the killers character whereas the Chinese press focused on contributing external factors.

There is also no word for individualism in the Chinese language, the closet to it would translate to selfishness.

Our Western selves have hero’s and villains, we have happy endings to our stories but in easterner stories known as kishotenketsu you are meant to find harmony in the story and the ending is left open for you to ponder, you have to find the answers for yourself.

I found this difference , an East /West divide interesting. Suicide was another statistic explored and again there is a difference in that suicide in the western world is more about the individual whereas suicide in the Eastern world is to protect others or the group, to bring harmony.

I am not what I think I am and I am not what you think I am; I am what I think that you think I am – Charles Horton Cooley (Sociologist)

From the age of 2 we start interacting with others and forming groups, to participate you need a sense of self, you start developing prejudices and biases, you develop hierarchies in your groups.

if others believe we are fancy and great, our looking-glass self interprets that as evidence that we ARE fancy and great. We’re self-conscious. we use clues from out there to tell us who we are in here.

We crave good reputation and feeling good, we are motivated by positive feelings and avoid the negative. We work to earn a living, to satisfy our basic needs of food and shelter but after this we need validation and self-worth. We continually adapt and change depending on the people that surround us or the situations we are in so we are not truly ‘one’ person but a fluid individual.

The Western Self  moved on through the ages, through the Christians struggle with the inner self, Freud and many others all leaving their mark on who we are today. The period of ‘Self-Esteem’ which  meant that no one fails, there were no winners in school races and the dreaded red pen used by teachers was replaced with a more placid green.

The current stage we are in is the age of Perfectionism, we have gone full circle back to out ancient Greeks. We tend to judge people more including ourselves, we are strong yet sensitive at the core. suicide rates are rising as more people fail to achieve their sense or perfect. Money and status are important and consumer consumption may be at the heart of it.

We live in an age of information, it is everywhere; in the shops, on tv, in the papers telling us we can loss weight, have nicer smiles, drive fancy cars, help ourselves to succeed in life… does this all really stem from the Ancient Greeks? Is it really because they believed that being physically beautiful equated to being ethically good and being physically ugly was the same as being bad, the word for this is kalokagathia (Kalos means beautiful, Kai means ‘and’, and agathos means good)?

Well this book has curtained made me understand more about the evolution of our ‘Self’ as well as understanding the differences between the East and West self.

 

 

Assignment 3 – Rework

Following on from assignment 3 and my tutors feedback I am commencing on a reading marathon , or at least a dip in and dip out, before a rework. I have also downloaded a numbers of books to my kindle which might aid me such as ‘Identity and Capitalism’, ‘The conquest of cool’ , ‘Image, Identity and John Wesley’, ‘Says Who?’, ‘Identities’, ‘Representing Ageing Images and Identities’.

I also might experiment photographing the shoes against black cloth rather than the white box as I struggle to get the whites consistent. And I also want to explore presenting the images as shoes boxes.

 

2018-03-11-17-34-53.jpg

Auto Focus

Auto Focus – The self-portrait in contemporary photography by Susan Bright.

This book is a really interesting insight into self portraiture although I was rather disappointed that absent portraiture was not really featured.

It is however interesting to see how individual each photographers approach to self portraiture is and the reasons behind the images.

There were a few images in which the photographer could not be seen such as those by Danny Treacy , Hew Locke , Julie Pochron , Nick Cave and Siya Singh but in my opinion they are not truly absent from the image.

I found the images taken by Nanna Saarhelo interesting in a fly on the wall approach. In her series ‘Sleep with me’ Saarhelo positioned a camera on a timer above her bed. As she slept in the bed with various people it took photos every 30 minutes. I find these images interesting as the dynamics of her relationship to those in her bed could be examined in the images, the closeness or distance captured whilst they slept.

I love Tatsumi Orimoto’s mother! The humour in the images and her sour deadpan face really chuckle me. The images appear so absurd but what baffles me the most is how a woman of her obvious age got herself into oil drums and giant cardboard boxes. I find myself wishing that there were before and after ‘out take’ shots as I think there might be more humour in seeing how it was done.

 

Assignment 2 – Research

Apart from my own knowledge of deafness growing up with a profoundly deaf mother I have been searching for books / articles on deafness as well as deaf photographers. I am hoping that I van gain an insight into the ‘feeling’ of deafness and in turn how I can portray it.

2017-10-03 22.09.31

I have also been watching some TV with ear defenders on and subtitles, much to the annoyance of my husband. Apparently he can’t ‘hear’ the TV with the subtitles on despite it being on full volume. The text is distracting him so I have saved this experiment for when he is out. I have also acquired some ‘In-ear’ defenders which I can wear out and about for the day, these do not cancel out the noise so much but would at least render me ‘hard of hearing’.

2017-10-04 20.32.36

Whilst wearing the ear defenders I have noticed that deafness is indeed not silent, I can hear my heartbeat and the whooshing of my blood. Some programs I can follow with ease however programs such as ‘The Apprentice’ are really difficult to understand as the scenes jump around and context is lost. I can follow it only because I usually watch it and I understand the style of the program. I can appreciate now why there are some programs which my mum really dislikes and cannot understand. I find that in following the text I am missing out on watching the expressions of the actors and the actual program itself, my eyes are continually flicking between the two, its hard work!

 

Ideas

Create at least two sets of photographs telling different versions of the same story. The aim of the assignment is to help you explore the convincing nature of documentary, even though what the viewer thinks they see may not in fact be true. Try to make both sets equally convincing so that it’s impossible to tell which version of the images is ‘true’.
It might be interesting to consider the project as evidence for a court case. What conflicting stories can you make your images convincingly tell? Would it stand up in court?

Re-reading the brief I am not sure that my initial ideas actually meet the criteria above? My ideas are centred around two versions of the truth (Hidden and public) but this seems to suggest one set should be ‘untrue’? Also I am unsure how I could tie in two sides to the gender debate? I think much more planning and experimenting is needed. I am aware that my second extended deadline is fast approaching and I still have coursework exercises to get through. I feel quite strongly about some of my idea so I would like to do them justice, otherwise I may need to rethink to a simpler idea and re-visit these for a re-work opportunity with more time to develop them.

I am currently reading through John Berger’s ‘Ways of seeing’ and ‘Gender Trouble’ by Judith Butler in the hope I can get some inspiration.